The action that actually matters here
For law firm websites that is usually requesting a consultation or an initial case review. FixSift checks whether that step is visible from the page, obvious enough to act on, and free of avoidable friction.
Lawyers
People contact a firm when they are confident it handles their exact problem and know what the first conversation involves. This free scan checks whether your site makes both of those obvious.
What you get: your FixSift score and your highest-priority findings, with the evidence behind each one. See what FixSift checks.
Enter your address and FixSift returns your score and your highest-priority findings. It is the same scanner the homepage runs — there is no separate engine behind this page.
This page reads the FixSift scan through one lens: what matters on law firm websites. The scanner is the same one the homepage uses — what changes is which findings are brought to the front.
For law firm websites that is usually requesting a consultation or an initial case review. FixSift checks whether that step is visible from the page, obvious enough to act on, and free of avoidable friction.
"Do you handle my kind of problem, and what happens if I contact you?" — the scan checks whether your page answers it before it asks for anything.
Commonly: Named solicitors with their areas of practice and experience; Practice areas described in the words clients use, not only legal terms; An explanation of what the first conversation involves and whether it costs anything; Regulatory registration details where they apply. FixSift reports which are present, which are missing and which are placed where nobody looks.
practice areas listed in legal language only, no explanation of what contact costs, the firm is described, the client is not, anonymous authority — each one checked against your page rather than assumed.
Messaging, conversion, trust and clarity, scored consistently so a rescan after changes is a fair comparison.
For many law firm websites the visitor arrives with a specific problem and some anxiety about cost and commitment. Clarity about practice areas and about what happens after they make contact tends to matter more than presentation.
Legal enquiries are high-consideration and low-frequency. A visitor rarely converts on impulse; they convert when the remaining uncertainty is small enough to act on.
That uncertainty is usually concrete: is this my kind of matter, who would handle it, what does contacting you commit me to. Sites that leave any of the three unanswered push the visitor back to search.
FixSift scores the page against those questions and puts the missing answer at the top of the list, so the first change you make is the one blocking enquiries rather than the one easiest to ship.
A common path, not a universal one. Where your visitors differ, the useful question is which step your page currently fails to support.
The free scan reads the page you give it. The paid audit looks across several of the site's important pages, which for law firm websites commonly means:
Examples of the next step that law firm websites typically need to make unmissable. FixSift checks whether yours is visible, singular and low-commitment enough to take.
Longevity is a trust signal, but it is not the answer to "do you handle this". FixSift flags when the first thing a visitor reads is not the thing they searched for.
The single line that removes the biggest objection is often the line placed furthest from where the objection is felt.
Twenty areas with equal weight tells a visitor nothing about focus. Pages that signal what the firm is known for read as more credible than pages that claim everything.
A visitor searching for "my employer fired me unfairly" may not recognise "contentious employment matters". Pages that never restate the service in client language lose the match.
Many visitors hesitate because they assume a phone call starts a bill. A single line describing whether the first conversation is free removes a common reason to leave.
Long history-of-the-firm copy above the fold delays the only answer the visitor came for: whether this firm handles their situation.
Pages that talk about "our team" without naming anyone make it hard to judge relevant experience, which is usually the deciding factor.
No account, no installation, no card.
Messaging, conversion, trust and clarity.
A score and your highest-priority findings.
Every page on this site runs the same scanner and the same analysis. There is no separate engine behind any of them — what changes is which findings are explained first.
Whether practice areas are stated in the language clients search with, whether the person who would handle the matter is identifiable, whether the cost and commitment of first contact are explained, and whether the next step is obvious from the page.
No. It does not assess whether your website meets any professional conduct, advertising or regulatory requirement. It is a conversion and clarity scan, and its findings are suggestions about communication, not legal guidance.
The free scan reads your homepage. The paid audit looks across several important pages of the site, which for a firm usually includes the practice area pages the homepage points at.
No. Enter your address, read your score and your top findings. No signup, no card, and no email needed to see the result.
No. It is the same scanner and the same analysis. What this page changes is the emphasis — findings are explained in terms of how visitors to law firm websites decide, which is where the useful difference is.
One address, one scan, one prioritised list. Free, and you keep the link to your result.