Plain statements of what you do
Whether the page contains an unambiguous description of the offering in text, rather than implying it through imagery or brand language.
AI readiness
Assistants and answer engines summarise pages the same way a hurried human does: from what the page states plainly. This scan checks whether yours states enough to be described correctly.
What you get: your FixSift score and your highest-priority findings, with the evidence behind each one. See what FixSift checks.
Enter your address and FixSift returns your score and your highest-priority findings. It is the same scanner the homepage runs — there is no separate engine behind this page.
This page reads the FixSift scan through one lens: whether a machine reader could summarise your page accurately. The scanner is the same one the homepage uses — what changes is which findings are brought to the front.
Whether the page contains an unambiguous description of the offering in text, rather than implying it through imagery or brand language.
Whether the business, its location where relevant, and its services are named in text a machine reader can attribute.
Key claims locked inside graphics or PDFs are invisible to most automated readers.
Whether the heading hierarchy describes the page's actual sections, which is what summarisers lean on.
Whether structured data, where present, describes what is really on the page rather than what you wish were.
More people now arrive at a decision after an assistant has summarised several sites for them. What the assistant can state about you comes from what your page states about itself.
That makes AI readiness largely the same discipline as clear writing: specific, textual, attributable claims. Pages that need context to be understood tend to be summarised badly or skipped.
FixSift does not measure your visibility inside any assistant, because that is not observable from your page. It reports whether your page gives a machine reader enough to work with — which is the part you control.
A human infers it from the picture. A text-based reader records nothing.
Without the place named in text, a local summary has nothing to cite.
Heading levels chosen for size rather than structure make the page's outline meaningless.
A page that never plainly says what the business does cannot be described accurately by anything, human or machine.
Text that appears only after a click or a scroll event may not be read at all.
Marking up reviews or products that do not exist on the page is a real risk, not a shortcut.
Nobody can currently report your impressions inside an assistant. Treat any tool that claims to with suspicion.
No account, no installation, no card.
Messaging, conversion, trust and clarity.
A score and your highest-priority findings.
Every page on this site runs the same scanner and the same analysis. There is no separate engine behind any of them — what changes is which findings are explained first.
No, and it will not claim to. Assistant visibility is not measurable from your page and FixSift does not fabricate ranking, impression or citation data. It reports whether your page is readable and describable, which is what you can act on.
There is a lot of overlap — clear text, honest structure, real headings. The difference in emphasis is that summarisers reward pages that state facts plainly and penalise pages that require inference.
Only where it is true. Structured data describing things your page does not contain is a liability rather than an optimisation.
No. It is a readability and clarity check. Technical crawling, indexation and link analysis are separate work.
One address, one scan, one prioritised list. Free, and you keep the link to your result.