Extraction before judgement
The page is read and its structure, copy, actions and proof are extracted first. Findings are formed from that record rather than from an impression.
AI-assisted
AI website audit
An automated review is only useful if you can check it. FixSift analyses your page and attaches the evidence to every finding, so you can judge the verdict rather than trust it.
What you get: your FixSift score and your highest-priority findings, with the evidence behind each one. See what FixSift checks.
Run your free scan
Enter your address and FixSift returns your score and your highest-priority findings. It is the same scanner the homepage runs — there is no separate engine behind this page.
What the scan checks
This page reads the FixSift scan through one lens: an automated analysis that cites the evidence behind each finding. The scanner is the same one the homepage uses — what changes is which findings are brought to the front.
Evidence on every finding
Each finding carries what triggered it — the line, the element, the absence — so you can disagree with it specifically.
Confidence, stated
Low-confidence observations are marked as such instead of being presented with the same certainty as the obvious ones.
Versioned analysis
Every scan records the analysis and scoring versions that produced it, so results stay comparable over time.
Consistency across runs
The same page scanned twice should produce substantially the same findings. Where it does not, that is treated as a defect.
Why this matters
The problem with automated audits is not that they are automated. It is that they are unfalsifiable: a list of generic recommendations with nothing tying them to your actual page.
FixSift is built the other way round. The analysis has to point at something on the page, and anything it cannot support, it does not claim.
That also sets the honest limits. It reads what is publicly visible; it does not know your customers, your margins or your funnel data, and it does not pretend to.
What this looks like in practice
A finding that quotes your headline back to you
"This headline does not name an audience" is arguable. "This headline — your exact line, quoted — does not name an audience" is checkable.
A missing element reported as an absence
Where no proof exists near the primary action, the finding says so rather than inventing a weakness in the proof.
A low-confidence observation, labelled
Where the page is ambiguous, FixSift says the reading is uncertain instead of guessing confidently.
Common issues we find
Generic AI output
Recommendations that would apply to any website are the clearest sign an audit never really read the page.
Confident hallucination
An automated audit that describes elements your page does not have is worse than no audit.
No versioning
If the model changes silently between runs, you cannot tell improvement from drift.
Analysis you cannot check
Any finding without evidence is an opinion. It may be right, but you cannot act on it with confidence.
How FixSift works
- 01
Enter your website
No account, no installation, no card.
- 02
FixSift reads the page
Messaging, conversion, trust and clarity.
- 03
Fix what matters first
A score and your highest-priority findings.
Every page on this site runs the same scanner and the same analysis. There is no separate engine behind any of them — what changes is which findings are explained first.
Frequently asked questions
Is this generated by AI?
The analysis is AI-assisted: the page is extracted and evaluated programmatically, and language models are used for the parts that require reading comprehension. Every finding carries the evidence it came from, and the versions used are recorded with the scan.
How do you avoid made-up findings?
Findings have to reference something extracted from the page. Observations that cannot be supported are dropped or marked low-confidence rather than presented as fact.
Does it replace a human reviewer?
No. It does the consistent, repeatable part quickly and cheaply. Judgement about your market, your pricing and your customers stays with you.
Will two scans of the same page agree?
They should. Consistency between runs is treated as a quality requirement, and rescans are compared finding by finding so you can see exactly what changed.
Related pages
Scan my website
One address, one scan, one prioritised list. Free, and you keep the link to your result.